I Find It Fitting to Celebrate National Atheist Day on April 1

-
April 1 is known as April Fool's Day. The April Fool is a fairy tale character who was known for being... a fool. Atheists wanted their day and they have it on April 1 which is just very fitting. It's because of what Psalm 14:1 says that the fool says in one's heart that there's no God. Here's also what the New Testament says about atheism:
Romans 1:21-32 - Because that, when they knew God, they glorified Him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, and changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

The problem of atheism is not that it's not an intellectual but a moral problem. They see that everything has a designer but they just want to say "Clearly no one made any of this." when it comes to the wondrous work of nature. The revelation of God is clear as day but they refuse to see it. As much as some atheists do believe in moral principles but what's the source of their moral principles? They make fools out of themselves whenever they deny the obvious.

The human body is so fantastically complex. The more I study science the more atheism doesn't make sense at all. There's a reason why the human body is so magnificently complex from every single cell to every system. The human body is so fantastically complex that any mutations or defects (as a result of the fall of man) would cause anyone not to function properly. It's no coincidence that you have a coccyx connected to your spine or that your skeleton serves its purpose or that your muscles cover your bones or that the tendons connect the joints. The whole body is too organized to have come in by years and years of atheistic evolution. Even some evolutionists (who are theistic) are bound to believe that divine intervention is needed. What's even funny is that Charles Darwin the man behind modern evolution was not an atheist.

Atheists claim to have a brain and creationists don't. But if they try to look up the human brain it's made up of 100 billion neurons and nearly 100 trillion synapses. Did atheistic evolution create it? Again, like the human body how can something so orderly and complex be a result of an accident? Accidents don't create order. No matter how many times you shake something it will never create something so orderly. Only the whims of an intelligent Designer could have come up with something as wonderfully fantastic as the human brain.

They want to teach that people came from animals but they complain to why people behave like animals. If you teach that that there's nothing but pitiless indifference as Richard Dawkins says it in his book "The River Out of Eden" then no one should complain if the strong destroy the weak. What grounds do they have to condemn religious child sacrifice if they support abortion? What grounds do they have to condemn Roman Catholic priests of raping altar boys if they adhere to the teaching that the strong have the right to bully the weak? The atheists' dilemma is that they only appeal to morals whenever it's convenient rather than appealing to it all the time.

In truth, atheism actually discourages true science. If they say that you have to be an atheist to be a true scientist then any scientist who's not an atheist should be ignored. That means it's time to stop studying physics because of Isaac Newton and get rid of the scientific method by Francis Bacon because they weren't atheists. They should stop enjoying what non-atheist scientists brought into the world. They are now committing the logical fallacies of genetic fallacy and Ad Hominem whenever they argue that only atheists can become scientists.

Their foolishness also steps from the fact that they are wise in their own eyes. Here's what King Solomon said about such people:
Proverbs 12:15 - The way of a fool is right in his own eyes: but he that hearkeneth unto counsel is wise.

They think they know everything and they are too smart for God. They think God is just a fairy tale even if they already know He isn't. In the end, they end up admitting that they really do hate God and call him a murderous monster. If there's really no moral absolutes then what ground do they have to condemn a holy and righteous God to start with?

See also: