Reformed Blogging

One of the arguments that I ran into some time ago is the cosmological argument for God's existence. Cosmology is the study of the universe. The Greek word "kosmos" means "world" and "logos" means "study". That means the cosmological argument of God is based on the study of relating with the origin and development of the universe. Cosmology is a branch of astronomy relating to the study of the development of the universe. Sadly, the study of cosmology today is tainted by the false doctrine of evolution by Charles Darwin - a view that pagans freely accept but Christians don't. Christians know evolution just can't be real based on scientific evidence. For the pagans, it's more of defending their religion since almost every pagan creation story is as messy as Darwin's views. Darwin was also from a family of Freemasons too. The more I study the science of the universe - the more it can be seen that it's not a result of random ...

I was doing some Tecarta Bible reading with the KJV Study Bible. One doctrinal footnote found in Psalm 94:9 is about the teleological argument for God's existence. The word teleological should not be confused with the word theological . Teleological is derived from "telos" which means "end or purpose". Teleology is the study of the evidence of design in nature. It was said that Aristotle had been the common inventor of teleology even if he was a pagan. The Greeks were pretty much pioneers of science in the ancient world and other useful modern concepts. What does it mean to have the teleological argument for the existence of God? It would mean to prove His existence by the order and arrangement of the Universe.  Psalm 94:9 says that He that planted the ear that formed the eye. I'm amazed at how atheistic evolutionists still insist evolution  is  real even with proof that the eye and ears are  too complex  to have come together on the basis of chaos. An evolu...

I was reading through the KJV Study Bible. Today's reading is from Hebrews 3 and the doctrinal footnote focuses on the ontological argument for God's existence. Ontology is "the branch of metaphysics dealing with the nature of being". It can also mean " a set of concepts and categories in a subject area or domain that shows their properties and the relations between them". In simple terms, it's the study of existence. An ontological argument is defined by Stanford as "arguments, for the conclusion that God exists, from premises which are supposed to derive from some source other than observation of the world—e.g., from reason alone. In other words, ontological arguments are arguments from what is typically alleged to be none but analytic, a prior and necessary premises to the conclusion that God exists." The word ontology comes from the word "ont" meaning "being" and "logy" meaning "study". Therefore, the...

I was looking at the calendar and I soon found out that Easter Sunday will fall on April 1, 2018 of all the days of the year! It's not the first time it happened as it historically happened in 1923, 1934, 1945 and 1956 and it won't happen again in 2023 assuming the Lord hasn't returned. But I feel this may be a sign of the times and this would be another blow to the face of atheism. This is the real mind-blowing thing about atheism. I have read various speculations without substance of Jesus' resurrection. I even remembered how an atheist blogger even wrote that Jesus probably just rolled away the stone in the grave and then He finally died. Others even said He just swooned on the cross. Others have the robbery theory. But all these theories don't make sense for many reasons. Simple science and history would show how atheism falls flat and the Bible is true. The Romans were pretty much experts. Both blood and water flowed out when the Centurion pierced Jesu...

The truth is it's been many years, there's been so much evidence to defend creationism or the teaching that life is no accident. Yet, how new is it that you have people who still keep insisting that I don't believe in science like they do? Not so new as Ecclesiastes 1:9 says there's nothing new under the sun in spite of all the scientific advancements.  What I find so scary is that atheistic evolutionists seek to discredit the Bible which accurately describes them. Scientific advancement has proven atheistic evolutionists wrong yet they insist that they are right. It's not surprising as Romans 1:20-21 warns that even when they see the evidence the problem is their hardened heart. They would do anything to win so they play dirty. It wasn't too surprising when I heard of a lot of fabricated evidence for evolution. A single skull, a single tooth - what's that going to prove? The same deception is still played today even after the chart was refuted by o...

Should I even be surprised that people today tell me I can't study science unless I believe in evolution? One thing that I need to emphasize is that evolution isn't exclusive to atheist and an evolutionist may also be a theist. Evolution itself has more theistic roots than atheistic roots. Almost every world religion buys Charles Darwin's creationism. What both atheistic evolutionists and theistic evolutionists have in common is to tell me that if I don't believe in evolution then I can't believe in science. This is problematic for one reason. Scientific proof destroys evolution yet these people insist that it supports them (Romans 1:18-24). If we're to use the scientific method to ask for evidence for evolution they always resolve to the use of logical fallacies. They tend to use Ad Hominem, character assassination, strawman attacks and false dichotomy just to name a few. Their favorite strawman argument is to immediately assume those who don't believ...

I remembered getting into an argument with an atheist who insists that no matter how complex the human body is that it's a product of evolutionary chance. That is really something not all evolutionists could even agree on. Not even Charles Darwin or Thomas Huxley were atheists even if they weren't Christians. The idea that no intelligence is required to create precisely coded information in biology is stupid. The accusation Christians aren't scientific is built on a strawman fallacy. Just consider which is more complex between the the robotic hand or the human hand. The human hand is more complex than the robotic hand yet atheists continue to insist that it just came by chance. Have they ever considered that every part of the body is fantastically complex that it couldn't come by chance?  I can't buy for a second that the whole Universe is just an accident with how marvelous it is. Is it a coincidence that the distance of the Earth from the sun is jus...

Some of the most arrogant words that any Christian may have read from the Bible says: Matthew 27:40  And saying, Thou that destroyest the temple, and buildest it in three days, save thyself. If thou be the Son of God, come down from the cross. Mark 15:30  Save thyself, and come down from the cross. It should give anyone pause at the audacity people have. They already saw the signs that Jesus could heal the sick and raise the dead. They already saw Jesus verify His claims but they didn't want Him because of the hardness of their hearts. I thought that what if Jesus with the consent of the Father came down from the cross that moment. Would the unbelieving crowd believe? My answer would still be no. Do you remember the Pharaoh during the Exodus? He already saw the signs. He already saw Moses' rod swallow up the others. He already saw unnatural signs and wonders hit Egypt. He already saw this and that but he still didn't believe. The same is applicable to the un...

When I hear the whole idea that "there are no absolutes" then I start to wonder how do atheists respond to traffic rules? Here's the quote that I love to use against atheists whenever they appeal to morals from "The River Out of Eden": The total amount of suffering per year in the natural world is beyond all decent contemplation. During the minute that it takes me to compose this sentence, thousands of animals are being eaten alive, many others are running for their lives, whimpering with fear, others are slowly being devoured from within by rasping parasites, thousands of all kinds are dying of starvation, thirst, and disease. It must be so. If there ever is a time of plenty, this very fact will automatically lead to an increase in the population until the natural state of starvation and misery is restored. In a universe of electrons and selfish genes, blind physical forces and genetic replication, some people are going to get hurt, other people are going ...

April 1 is known as April Fool's Day. The April Fool is a fairy tale character who was known for being... a fool. Atheists wanted their day and they have it on April 1 which is just very fitting. It's because of what Psalm 14:1 says that the fool says in one's heart that there's no God. Here's also what the New Testament says about atheism: Romans 1:21-32 -  Because that, when they knew God, they glorified Him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations , and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, and changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is ...

I've heard atheists say, "You Christians are the most unscientific people ever!" They have their mentality to use Ad Hominem and strawmen arguments. This is about attacking the person instead of the argument and misrepresenting the opponent. Worse, they think they've won the argument whent he opponent is too frustrated with their foolishness. I don't like listening to their nonsense arguments not because they're so smart and I'm so stupid (I'm being sarcastic) but because they utter more nonsense than sense in almost every argument. This is all about the quest for dominance of mankind and the dethroning of God. They can go ahead and laugh at me but Judgment Day won't be funny at all.  Whether those atheists like it or not, science teaches us that there's an Intelligent Design involved. Even the teaching of Darwinian evolution (which isn't a scientific process) still requires an Intelligent Designer. What surprised me to learn was tha...

From Veterans to Christ, here's a picture that I'd love to show to atheists who say that I'm being rude to tell them about Jesus and that God is real. They say that I'm trying to "shove the Bible down their throats" and that I'm supposedly "forcing them to believe" even when I'm just stating the facts. It's like accusing the doctor of forcing you to receive treatment even when the doctor is simply warning you about your condition and won't force you to get treatment unless you're willing to cooperate.  I'd like to tell the atheists so if it's rude for me to tell them about Jesus then why is it okay for them to exercise their abusive behavior? Why is it okay for them not to listen to my side of the story for evidence of creation granting more chances for supposed "proof" of evolution? This shows that these militant atheism's double standard. While they wanted to lie that the whole Scopes Monkey Trial wa...

Whether the evolutionist is a theist or an atheist the problem is that the fossil record is not a record for evolution. I'm amazed at how the evolutionist regardless of his or her religious views would use the fossil record to "prove" evolution. What's even more stupid is these people try to do something as to say that the single piece of fossil is proof of evolution just because they said so. Just think of how these "links" are supposedly established by a skull, a jawbone or just any piece of fossil as evidence isn't even scientific. No, there's nothing scientific about it when the person plays the game of false dilemma by saying something like, "If you don't believe me then you're not scientific." That's not scientific at all. So much for saying that evolution is a scientific theory. No, it's not even a scientific theory but just a stupid list of speculations by people who profess themselves to be wise but becam...

Here's a cartoon that really tells me why I find arguing with atheists so vexing. I really want to say to them, "Look! I already gathered all the evidence for design! You see it everywhere that everything has a designer and yet you refuse to believe that nature has a designer? Here's all the evidence and what do you want me to do before you believe?" It's so vexing because nature shows everything has a Designer yet the atheist still insist that it happened by accident. Then when all the evidences goes against them, it's time to ask, "Look, you already see all the evidence that there's a God why do still insist He doesn't exist." Then it's time for them to contradict themselves when they admit their hatred for God. They may say, "I hate God because He's taking away everything from me!" And the Bible gives us the reason why they refuse to believe in God: Romans 1:28-32  And even as they did not like to retain God ...

Here's a clip from the movie "God's Not Dead". Atheists say that it's one sided and biased but look who's talking. I always gave a thought on this stressful truth. Look, I already spent all my time gathering evidence even from former atheists. I started gathering for more evidence that life is no accident and science provides it but why do atheists want to continue in their rebellion and insist that God doesn't exist? The video above shows the timeless truth that atheists really hate God but they don't want to readily admit it .  What does the Bible say about this and why do atheists want to discredit the Bible? The Bible knows everything about our sin. Here's what the Bible says about atheism and it speaks so true about them: Romans 1:20-32 - "For the invisible things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excu...

It can't be denied that militant atheists think that to be an atheist means to reach unlimited human progress. If that were true then why are people living in atheist governments in so much suffering and why are states where Christianity is allowed to flourish more progressive and orderly than the atheist states? I could start to raise the issue of atheism with some science. They may go ahead and dismiss me with Ad Hominem attacks saying that, "You're a Christian and you should shut up." Listen to what's being said and not to who's saying it. It's all about facts and not about the person relaying the facts. The atheist logic thinks that the robotic hand is intelligent design because it wasn't "waved by a magic wand". But they want to dismiss the complexity of the human to be merely coincidence rather than a result of intelligent design. Even if I tell them that there's no way that the human body is coincidence they still don'...

Atheists have their tendency to say, "I don't believe in God because I can't see Him." I would like to challenge the fallacy of their thinking by asking, "If you can't see God then can you see the air you breathe, the atoms that hold the Universe together, the ultraviolet rays that enter into the Earth's atmosphere... you can't see them but it's there. I guess you should stop believing in the reality of their existence." I could also ask them this, "You haven't seen evolution in action. You say that it can't be observed because it happened for millions of years. Tell me, why do you choose to refuse to believe in God because you can't see Him yet you believe in evolution which you provide no real evidence. These are just pieces of bones you don't even know where they came from. One skull, one tooth.. those aren't transitional fossils and many of those so-called fossils are just fake." I wonder if they'r...

What makes my mind blow is that Richard Dawkins said that it's a fact that life evolved out of nearly NOTHING after the universe evolved out of nothing. He says it's a fact but where is the data to prove that the universe evolved out of nothing after billions of years? It wasn't observable nor was it tested. The whole idea of evolution is unscientific because there's nothing provable with his statement. Atheists claim to be the most scientific people but they haven't proven anything yet a lot of people believe them. Some atheistic scientists have studied science for themselves yet they don't realize the simple truth that science contradicts evolution. Do you want to know what God thinks about this one? The Apostle Paul wrote: Romans 3:19-21 - Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. For the invisible things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are...

Many people keep saying, "Don't judge me!" Well it's time to really use this poster against them. Atheists are fond of saying that Christians shouldn't judge them, that Christians are bigots and that they're their own. I guess they don't want to be told what needs to be told. In this same picture, the one who says Christians are bigots is told that the car's lights were left on. Now don't tell me he also wants to punch the person for "judging" him by reminding him his lights were turned on?

Atheists have the claim that they're "freethinkers" and that people are bound to think for themselves. But is it really the case? I want to really give my thoughts on why atheists are not really free in their thinking as they love to claim it. One of the biggest lies atheism says is that atheism is when people think for themselves, that they analyze everything they think but are they really that free to think or analyze things as they claim?  A militant atheist I knew years ago may have called Ken Ham an idiot may also be because of this cartoon on the right from "Answers in Genesis". In the atheist educational system, you're actually required to believe that there are no absolutes (while hypocritically condemning theists Christian or not), that people are just animals (while hypocritically getting mad when people act like animals), that the disasters brought humans to existence, that there's no God and that the Bible isn't true. All the while t...