I'm Amazed Many Still Mock at the Resurrection In Spite of Critical Evidence

-
There are people today who still say, "We're too scientific to believe in a God." Really? I don't see any reason why God is contradicted by science. Some will try to explain away the resurrection with various speculations to try and explain away. Here are the following speculations that were made in the attempt to explain away the resurrection. 

Here are the common ones I hear and why I don't believe them:
  • The robbery theory
    • A study of history would show that there are stiff penalties for soldiers caught sleeping on duty. 
    • Did the Pharisees who bribed the soldiers aware that termination wasn't the only thing waiting for the soldiers? Soldiers caught sleeping on duty were also executed for sleeping on duty. 
    • Also, the disciples were too afraid to even attempt to steal the body. Not to mention, the linen cloth was in place and it was empty. 
  • The vision theory
    •  If it were all a vision, how do we account for the women who wanted to anoint the bloody body? 
    • In the history of hallucinations, there is no incident in which five hundred people from different backgrounds, of different temperaments, ever saw the same vision at the same time! 
    • Also if it was just a hallucination, the disciples would then want to check the tomb if the body was still there.
  • The swoon theory
    • Jesus was heavily scourged by the cat-o-nine tails and He was already a bloody pulp and much blood was lost. Most victims of the scourging died from the process alone.
    • The Roman soldiers were adept at checking out the death of the crucified men. The Roman centurion decided to check if Jesus was physically dead pierced the spear on His side which then flowed out not only blood but also water, proving that every last drop of blood was gone that water also came out. In biology, a dead man's blood would separate blood and water compared to the blood of a living man.
    • Some atheists claim that Jesus after being placed in the tomb, woke up and pushed the rock aside to fool everyone He had risen and eventually died. Further common sense would tell that this is also stupidly said because one He was wrapped in graveclothes which would restrict movement, spices would prevent reviving, and open-air would be required to revive a swooned person, not a closed tomb. I should mention that His wrists and legs were pierced with nails, He was a bloody pulp and it's definitely a challenge for the creators of this theory to actually try it themselves if they dare!
  • The UFO theory
    • They don't believe in God just because they don't see Him (then stop breathing) but they believe aliens exist. Many atheist writers even promote the nonsense of UFOs which they even have not proven to be real.

I also hear that other religions simply want to say the resurrection happened because He was an avatar of Vishnu or a Bodhisattva. Others deny that Jesus was ever crucified like in Islam. All these are simply false. Jesus is not an avatar of Vishnu, a Boddhisatva, or never crucified. Celebrating Easter while believing all religions lead to Heaven is just blasphemy. 

The problem of being a fool is not an intellectual problem but a moral problem. Being a fool or a stupid person is not limited to intellectual capacity. Rather, some of the most stupid people are highly educated or even get high grades. The foolishness here is a heart issue that ends up becoming a brain issue. Both the heart and mind need to be cleansed. They want to deny the resurrection in spite of evidence because of a moral issue. They are greater fools than people with lower IQ because they have the intellectual capacity but refuse to believe obvious evidence.

See also: