Reformed Blogging

I was doing some Tecarta Bible reading with the KJV Study Bible. One doctrinal footnote found in Psalm 94:9 is about the teleological argument for God's existence. The word teleological should not be confused with the word theological . Teleological is derived from "telos" which means "end or purpose". Teleology is the study of the evidence of design in nature. It was said that Aristotle had been the common inventor of teleology even if he was a pagan. The Greeks were pretty much pioneers of science in the ancient world and other useful modern concepts. What does it mean to have the teleological argument for the existence of God? It would mean to prove His existence by the order and arrangement of the Universe.  Psalm 94:9 says that He that planted the ear that formed the eye. I'm amazed at how atheistic evolutionists still insist evolution  is  real even with proof that the eye and ears are  too complex  to have come together on the basis of chaos. An evolu...

Should I even be surprised that people today tell me I can't study science unless I believe in evolution? One thing that I need to emphasize is that evolution isn't exclusive to atheist and an evolutionist may also be a theist. Evolution itself has more theistic roots than atheistic roots. Almost every world religion buys Charles Darwin's creationism. What both atheistic evolutionists and theistic evolutionists have in common is to tell me that if I don't believe in evolution then I can't believe in science. This is problematic for one reason. Scientific proof destroys evolution yet these people insist that it supports them (Romans 1:18-24). If we're to use the scientific method to ask for evidence for evolution they always resolve to the use of logical fallacies. They tend to use Ad Hominem, character assassination, strawman attacks and false dichotomy just to name a few. Their favorite strawman argument is to immediately assume those who don't believ...

Whether the evolutionist is a theist or an atheist the problem is that the fossil record is not a record for evolution. I'm amazed at how the evolutionist regardless of his or her religious views would use the fossil record to "prove" evolution. What's even more stupid is these people try to do something as to say that the single piece of fossil is proof of evolution just because they said so. Just think of how these "links" are supposedly established by a skull, a jawbone or just any piece of fossil as evidence isn't even scientific. No, there's nothing scientific about it when the person plays the game of false dilemma by saying something like, "If you don't believe me then you're not scientific." That's not scientific at all. So much for saying that evolution is a scientific theory. No, it's not even a scientific theory but just a stupid list of speculations by people who profess themselves to be wise but becam...

This is one thing I've heard and I'm pretty ready to slam my head at the desk yet again. From what I heard, Harambe the gorilla was shot to save a child. Unfortunately for animal rights activists, we're already seeing animals getting more rights than humans. So what's really more important? A gorilla's life or those who died for the country's freedom? A gorilla's life or the unborn whose rights are denied no thanks to political correctness?  I would dare say that it's because today people are taught evolution in the schools. The idea that men are just "human apes" has been more accepted than special creation. The idea that men and apes either have a common ancestor or that men came from monkeys are just unscientific. The rule of genetics says that everything reproduces according to its own kind. Today's people have willfully become so ignorant to the point they think they're so wise even when they're so foolish. Romans 1:22 w...

In the world of nom sequitur arguments, atheistic evolutionists tend to say, "If you don't beleive in atheistic evolution, you're unscientific." Ever since I heard of the false account of the Scopes Monkey Trial which was a load of lies, evolution today loves to use one of the most abused statements ever saying statements like, "Studies show...", "All the scientists accept it...", "Nobody cares...", "Science says...", "It's accepted everywhere..." and "the evidence is overwhelming..." to make people believe a lie.  Why do I want to say your stupidity is overwhelming to the atheistic evolutionist? Plain and simple, it doesn't take a biologist to understand basic biology . If you know the basic rule of genetics, it affirms Genesis with the principle that everything reproduces according to its own kind. If apes, monkeys and humans had a common ancestor then why can't apes and humans reproduce?...